Skip to main content

How Good Is Modi As A Reformer - An Analysis Of Modi's India

Modi As A Reformer

Before Prime Minister Modi's US visit and the first ever Modi-Trump meeting, several global media houses have analyzed the three years of Modi's government. They are doing their best to highlight the failure of the Modi government, downplaying all the achievements of India during three years. Of all those, the Economist magazine's analysis, I think, is the one that deserves good attention.

According to the Economist, prime minister Narendra Modi is not much as a big reformer as he seems. In the beginning, the article gives some credit to Modi for boosting the economic growth of India. It says, before the arrival of Modi, India was growing at a relatively slower rate of 6.4% than after the 2014 election. In 2015, India became the world's fastest growing economy with a growth rate of 7.9%. It also mentioned the economic reforms like GST and Bankruptcy law which have been successfully passed by the legislature.

But, then, it says "These facts are deceiving. The GST, although, was much needed to end the confusing array of taxes, the present government has unnecessarily complicated it by making it too bureaucratic in nature, which has greatly reduced its efficiency."

The article also blamed state-owned banks, immersed in debt, for delaying the financial reform. To curb the problem of declining loans and rising NPA, it suggests the government the option of privatization. it says, “the lending to the industry is contracting for the first time in 20 years; Mr Modi should recapitalize state-owned banks and sell them off.”

And, according to The Economist, demonetisation was counterproductive. It has only hamstrung legitimate business without doing much to the illegitimate ones and taken the growth rate of the Indian economy back to 6.1%, even worse than when Mr Modi came to power.

The article tries to project Modi as a right-wing Hindu zealot citing reasons like the appointment of a controversial man as chief minister of the most populous state of India, Uttar Pradesh. It tried to project the rise of Hindu nationalism in India with Yogi Adityanath becoming chief minister of UP who immediately pursued a full crackdown on illegal slaughtering houses after coming to power.

My assessment:

In a huge democracy like India, having remarkable pluralism, bringing a reform of any kind – political, economic or social – is an extremely cumbersome task. Sometimes, it becomes just impossible. For example, whenever the government will to bring a Uniform Civil Code(UCC), mentioned in the Directive Principles of State Policy, to further the equality principle, the Muslim community becomes agitated for no good reason. And, in the name of secularism, there is also widespread protest in different parts of the country against the UCC. The Muslims make it a religious issue, making the progress of UCC heading to nowhere.

It is only easy to bring reform in a dictatorial regime or by the means of violent revolution. In democracies, it will take its time as the leaders have to take care of the public sentiments. However, there is a scenario in which a democracy can be reformed. It is when both the ruling party government and opposition think and only think of the welfare of the people. This concept stems from idealism, practically it is very difficult, especially in India where being in opposition means opposing every movement of the government.

Mr Modi has brought down monetary governmental corruption to nil. This is quite a big achievement of Modi's government, especially if you remember the situation in India before the 2014 election. Certainly, the corruption has not been fully eradicated, but the government is hoping to achieve that too.

Yes, the state-owned banks is a burden on the economy. Banking is just like any other business and this business need not be carried out by the state; it just needs to be regulated. Banks were nationalized for building the trust of the people in banks. At that time, India was an economically unliberal country struggling with socialist ideology. The absence of competition among the public sector banks and a lack of professionalism can be easily noticed. Privatization of the banks is a very good option, it should be done as early as possible.

Nonetheless, I agree with most of the points of the article and consider it as a legitimate one, I have a serious disagreement with these:



Conclusion:


Like any other western media analysis, the Economist article also seems to be biased. Others just blatantly try to ridicule India, in which they end up ridiculing themselves. The Economist, on the other hand, tried to do it by cleverly selling some intellectual facts. It has ignored all the achievements of Modi's India despite naming the cover of the magazine in capital letters as "MODI'S INDIA".

Still, I would say is really good, considering its opinion on various issues of India and giving attention to the real issues; it is of excellent quality if we compare it with other foreign media that cover India or, in particular, has covered the three years of Modi's India.

So, I think, it doesn't matter whether this article criticizes or praises Modi, the only thing I liked here is that it talked about India of the 21st century unlike other so-called global news brands still having the picture of India as a land of snake-charmers and superstitious believers, even when India is the only country that has successfully accomplished its Mars mission in its maiden attempt and launching hundreds of foreign satellites on a regular basis. They just can't digest the fact that India has moved on and is progressing at a rapid rate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sanjay Dutt Hero Or Villain? A Review Of Sanju Baba’s Journey As Both

The Sanjay Dutt biopic “Sanju” was released on 29th of June made by one of the best filmmakers of the B-town, Rajkumar Hirani. It was marketed as an “unbelievably true story”. Indeed Dutt’s journey is unbelievable. However, there have been many unbelievable personalities too such as Dawood or Osama. Sorry for comparing Dutt with Don and Terrorist. The drugs, booze, women, and AK 56 make Sanju a largely negative character in the real world. Not his fault, according to the film.


Some people say Sanjay Dutt doesn’t deserve a biopic as there are many “good” people, with their “good” work, that go unnoticed. The argument over whether Dutt deserves a biopic or not is inane. It’s like saying Dhoni’s biopic should have been made after his retirement. The truth is, biopics are made on interesting people, not the good ones, especially if it is of commercial in nature. If that interesting people is a negative character, it gets more publicity. Also, a “fictional” biopic cannot be real. Be it Da…

Making A Difference — Indian Media And Ravish Kumar

Today's Bulletin: Priya Prakash Varrier’s killing wink, Taimur’s daily schedule, 'Rashtramata' Padmavati, Donald Trump tweets, Different types of jihad - love jihad, hate jihad, cow jihad, North Korea’s ‘mental dictator’ Kim Jong Un's preparation for a nuclear war, and last, but not the least —An esteemed panel of 'alleged' experts and politicians engaging in an ‘alleged’ debate.
If you are a consumer of Indian media, particularly the news channels, you might have got the idea of what my opening words are and where I’m trying to point it. If you think, all mediawallahs (media personnel) are same, or that these are really important topics worthy of your time, you need to think again.

There is a 'proven' left-wing terrorist, and an atheist, perhaps, NDTV journo named Ravish Kumar who is different. The non-Hindi Indian states might not have heard his name. He is not interested in covering ‘big stories’, no loud debates, no panel of Pakistani alleged ‘defe…

The Sensational Case of Salman Khan and Black Bucks, After Two Decades Justice Served?

Before beginning, I would like to reiterate that Salman Khan is just a cinema star, nothing more nothing less. So leave celebrity worship aside and try to be pragmatic.

Salman Khan’s past was nowhere similar to his modern-day superhit films. Infamously known as the bad boy of Bollywood, he has been directly involved in criminal cases of pretty grave nature. Hit-and-run case, in which he allegedly under the influence of alcohol ran his car on the footpath in which one person was killed and four got injured. In that case, first his driver was made a scapegoat but a little while later, things became murky the result of which Khan was acquitted by the Mumbai HC in 2015. His relationship with Aishwarya Rai (Bachchan) fetched an excellent TRPs to our media, first with and rumours about their relationship, then with confirmed rumours, and even after the break-up, when former miss world accused him of harassing her. Black Bucks/Chinkara poaching case, about which this post is all about, and,…

The Triple Talaq Bill: A Final Step To Settle Gender Justice Debate Among Muslims

I’ve written a post earlier on the issue of triple talaq in June last year when the government opposed that in the Supreme Court. The SC held that talaq-e-biddat or instant triple talaq is unconstitutional, arbitrary and thus declared it void. Now, the legislation is being done with the continuation of the judicial declaration, with a triple talaq bill already been passed in the Lok Sabha and waiting to be passed in the Rajya Sabha. The bill shall provide a legal right to the Muslim women against this practice and make it a "criminal and non-bailable offence".

But, some Islamic scholars and ‘secular’ politicians are questioning the authority of the Parliament. Isn’t it the Legislature that is formally authorised to initiate and bring reform in the society? Triple talaq is an unjust practice that has been carried out in independent India which is shameful. This practice has been even discontinued in many sharia abiding countries. The parliament has only initiated the legisla…

The Padmavaat Circus — A Brief Summary

OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS, the nation has witnessed a bizarre issue. We have been battling with the question of whether a film should be allowed to screen or not. It is definitely a matter of concern if a movie is not allowed to be showcased, and even more if the makers and artists receive threats. But, don't you think we gave it more importance than what it really deserved? It certainly was not worthy of the space for prime time debates every single day as if it is the “only” thing India is concerned about.


From the beginning, I was appalled by the duration of time Padmavati remain in the news. After the news, they do a stupid TV debate about the same. We then also saw TV anchors giving a "no-objection certificate" to the movie happily. It was at a time when the film had not been even sent to the CBFC. But, there was a journalist/anchor who was showing the educational crisis in the country instead of a frivolous debate of whether Padmavati to be allowed to release or not.…

The Story Of World's Longest Human Chain - Bihar Manav Shrinkhla

On January 21, 2018, (the people of) Bihar assembled together to form a human chain, the manav shrinkhla. It was the world's longest human chain ever formed. Last year, exactly on the same date, Bihar had formed a similar human chain to show their firm stand against alcoholism. At that moment, it was also claimed and publicized as the largest human chain ever formed in the world. But this year, it has been covered only as a news and not discussed widely on the Op-ed page. So, probably I’m filling the spaces our mediawallahs has left empty.

For your information, a human chain is a demonstration by the masses to show political solidarity, for or against a cause, in which people link arms with one another to form a large chain. Usually, the organizers of such event put an exaggerated data to the public in order to show how genuine their concern is. Still, it's a universal method to win support and encouragement of the public.
We can say that Bihar government has actually celebrat…